• 인사이트
  • Say Do Gap

33% of Premium-Car Intenders Ended Up Buying a Mass-Market Brand, ConsumerInsight Finds

2026-05-21
Purchase plans held far more strongly for mass-market, domestic and RV buyers than for premium, imported and sedan intenders, the latest `Say-Do Gap` analysis shows.

The Say-Do Gap Series III: Premium vs. Mass-Market Brand Purchases within One Year

- 33% of premium-brand intenders bought a mass-market brand, while only 5% of mass-market intenders moved to premium.
- Plan realization was far higher for mass-market brands and domestic cars (95% and 94%) than for premium brands and imported cars (67% and 71%).
- Among premium brands, BMW led with a 65% realization rate, followed by Mercedes-Benz at 52% and Genesis at 42%.
- RV intentions held far more strongly than sedan intentions: 91% versus 73%. Midsize RVs had the highest realization rate among segment/body types, at 81%.
- Gasoline and EV intenders posted realization rates of 71% and 72%, compared with 63% for hybrids (HEV) and just 33% for diesel and 22% for LPG.

SEOUL, South Korea - May 21, 2026 - ConsumerInsight today released the third report in its `The Say-Do Gap` series, examining how consumers` stated auto purchase intentions changed by the time they actually bought a new car. The analysis compares plan realization rates by origin, brand tier, vehicle type and segment, and fuel type.

The central finding: among consumers who said they intended to buy a premium brand within one year, one in three, or 33%, ultimately bought a mass-market brand instead. By contrast, only 5% of those who intended to buy a mass-market brand moved the other way and bought a premium brand. The results show that aspirations formed before shopping - for an imported or premium car - are often revised downward by the time of final purchase.

At the Final Payment Stage: `Compromising with Budget Reality`

The Say-Do Gap was largest in brand tier and vehicle origin. The plan realization rate - the share of buyers who purchased a car with the same attribute they originally intended - was 67% for premium-brand intenders and 71% for imported-car intenders [Table 1]. By comparison, 95% of mass-market-brand intenders bought a mass-market brand, and 94% of domestic-car intenders bought a domestic car. Roughly three in ten consumers who set out to buy a premium or imported car ultimately scaled back to a mass-market or domestic model at the point of purchase.

[Table 1] Purchase Intention Realization Rate by Brand Tier and Origin Based on 1-year purchase intenders who actually bought (N varies by category)
Categroy Realization Rate (%) Attrition Rate (%)
By Brand Tier
└ Premium Brands 67 33
└ Mass-Market Brands 95 5
By Origin
└ Imported Cars 71 29
└ Domestic Cars 94 6
Premium Top Three: BMW Leads, but Attrition Paths Differ

Results also varied sharply among the three major premium brands covered in the report. BMW had the highest plan realization rate at 65%, followed by Mercedes-Benz at 52% and Genesis at 42%, with gaps of more than 10 percentage points between each brand [Table 2]. Among BMW intenders, 19% chose a Hyundai Motor Group brand (Kia, Hyundai or Genesis combined), while only 2% moved to Mercedes-Benz.

[Table 2] Purchase Intention and Top Attrition Paths for Premium Brands Base: premium-brand intenders (n as noted)
Intended Brand (Sample Size) Realization Rate (%) Attrition Paths (Destination & Rate)
BMW (n=62) 65 1. Kia (11%) 2. Hyundai (5%) 3. Genesis (3%) 4. Mercedes-Benz (2%)
Mercedes-Benz (n=46) 52 1. BMW (17%) 2. Kia (13%) 3. Genesis (4%)
Genesis (n=142) 42 1. Hyundai (22%) 2. Kia (17%) 3. BMW (4%) 4. Mercedes-Benz (2%)

Among Mercedes-Benz intenders, 17% chose BMW and 13% chose Kia - together accounting for more than half of Mercedes-Benz`s 48% attrition. BMW`s win over Mercedes-Benz was decisive: only 2% of BMW intenders moved to Mercedes-Benz, while 17% of Mercedes-Benz intenders moved to BMW. The shift may partly reflect the wave of rumors linking Mercedes-Benz and Chinese-made components that followed the August 2024 Incheon Cheongna apartment fire.

Genesis had the lowest realization rate among the three at 42%, but 39% of Genesis intenders chose a Hyundai Motor Group brand - nearly matching its own realization rate - which limited real losses to brands outside the group. Notably, defectors from both BMW and Mercedes-Benz chose Kia over Hyundai by a wide margin, suggesting that an affinity for premium imports may correlate with resistance specifically to the Hyundai brand rather than to Hyundai Motor Group as a whole.

Midsize RVs Post the Highest Realization Rate, at 81%

By vehicle type, practical choices were more likely to hold. RV intenders had a 91% realization rate, compared with 73% for sedan intenders [Table 3]. Looking at segment and body type together, midsize RVs had the highest realization rate at 81%, followed by small sedans (67%), small RVs and large sedans (66% each), and large RVs (62%). Midsize sedans - once the standard family car - recorded the lowest rate among all attributes measured in the report, at 55%, with nearly half of midsize-sedan intenders switching to a different segment or body type. The result points to a broader consumer shift toward larger vehicles alongside continued RV strength.

[Table 3] Purchase Intention Realization Rate by Vehicle Type and Segment/Body Type Based on 1-year purchase intenders who actually bought
Category Realization Rate (%)
By Vehicle Type
RV 91
Sedan 73
By Segment / Body Type
Midsize RV 81
Small Sedan 67
Small RV 66
Large Sedan 66
Large RV 62
Midsize Sedan 55
The Hybrid Paradox: A Lower Realization Rate Than Gasoline

Fuel-type results point to a `hybrid paradox.` Gasoline and electric vehicle (EV) intenders posted plan realization rates of 71% and 72% respectively, while hybrid (HEV) intenders recorded 63%; diesel and LPG intenders were lowest, at 33% and 22% [Table 4]. ConsumerInsight said the pattern likely reflects real-world constraints on hybrids - higher prices and long delivery waits - rather than cooling demand, as consumers who originally wanted a hybrid shifted to other fuel types when faced with those obstacles.

[Table 4] Purchase Intention Realization Rate by Fuel Type Based on 1-year purchase intenders who actually bought
Fuel Type Realization Rate (%)
EV (Electric) 72
Gasoline 71
HEV (Hybrid) 63
Diesel 33
LPG 22
Understanding Why Consumers Trade Down

The Say-Do Gap has long been one of the toughest challenges for marketers. This report gives them a clearer picture: realization rates run consistently higher for domestic, mass-market, RV and EV choices, and the data point to some of the reasons why. ConsumerInsight said further analysis will refine these explanations and support a more evidence-based approach to understanding automotive consumers.




Notes

- Analysis base: This analysis is based on 31,852 respondents who participated continuously in ConsumerInsight`s 2024~2025 Annual Automobile Syndicated Study, narrowed to consumers who stated in 2024 that they planned to buy a new car within one year and actually did so. (ConsumerInsight 2024~2025 Annual Automobile Syndicated Study)

- Metric definition: `Plan realization rate` means the share of buyers who purchased a car with the same attribute they originally intended, such as the same origin, brand tier, vehicle type/segment or fuel type. (ConsumerInsight definition)

- RV definition: RV refers to recreational vehicles, contrasted with sedans in the vehicle-type analysis. (ConsumerInsight report terminology)

- Hyundai Motor Group brands: For the purposes of this report, Hyundai Motor Group brands comprise Hyundai, Kia and Genesis. (ConsumerInsight report terminology)

Methodology

ConsumerInsight has conducted its Annual Automobile Syndicated Study every July since 2001 with an annual sample of roughly 100,000 automotive consumers (95,696 respondents in the 2025 wave). This analysis matched 31,852 respondents who participated in both the 2024 and 2025 waves and compared each respondent`s 2024 stated one-year purchase intention with their actual vehicle purchase behavior as of the 2025 survey.

- Population: Licensed drivers who own a vehicle or plan to purchase one within two years
- Sampling frame: ConsumerInsight’s Invight Panel and quota-based samples from major Korean portal-site panels
- Sampling method: Gender- and age-based quota sampling
- Survey mode: Email and mobile survey
- Survey content: Usage & Attitude (U&A) and Consumer Experienced Quality (CEQ)
- Survey period: July 2023 and July 2025

About ConsumerInsight

ConsumerInsight is a leading South Korean market research firm specializing in automotive consumer data and analytics. Since 2001, it has conducted the Annual Automobile Syndicated Study, surveying approximately 100,000 automotive consumers every July - one of the largest continuous automotive consumer studies in the world. Drawing on more than two decades of longitudinal data, ConsumerInsight provides in-depth insight into consumer behavior, market trends, and industry benchmarks.
For more information, please visit https://www.consumerinsight.co.kr/eng/

Copyright ⓒ ConsumerInsight. All rights reserved.
This material may be quoted or cited by media for news purposes. Any other form of reproduction, distribution, or secondary use requires prior written consent.


For-more-Information
Sammy Park, Managing Director sammy.park@consumerinsight.kr 02-6004-7661
Yanghyuk Kim, Research Fellow kimyh@consumerinsight.kr 02-6004-7604